SNAPSHOT
Process: Community Panel (deliberative process)
Timeframe: June 2016 – August 2017 (3.5 days panel deliberation)
Client: Barwon Water
Wider engagement phase design & delivery: Barwon Water, EY Sweeney and Newgate Research
Deliberative phase design & facilitation: MosaicLab
Panel selection: Deliberately Engaging
Participants: 27 (community panel), approx. 5,050 (wider engagement), 1260 (community feedback phase)
Outputs: 20 recommendations (5 outcomes and 15 service preferences)
AN AWARD WINNING PROJECT
Barwon Water and MosaicLab were awarded Highly Commended in the Planning category at the 2018 IAP2 Core Values Awards for this project.
View all the winners here.REMIT
What do you value most about water and sewerage services and what do you expect in the future?
OVERVIEW
In 2017, 27 everyday Barwon Water customers came together to deliberate over what they expect and value most when it comes to water and sewerage services. The group grappled with technical inputs, weighed up complex options, and considered diverse customer needs to determine how to balance prices and services.
These deliberations formed part of an 18-month engagement process that would help shape Barwon Water’s 2018 Price Submission to the Essential Services Commission. The process offered customers an unprecedented level of involvement in and influence over Barwon Water’s future pricing and priorities.
MosaicLab designed and facilitated the deliberative phase of the engagement. This included two and a half days of community panel deliberations, online discussions and a review day where panellists came back together to consider community feedback on their recommendations.
The process was underpinned by Barwon Water’s commitment to listen to, respond to and collaborate with its customers. The project had a wide range of positive impacts, and, ultimately, a transformative effect on the organisation and its relationships.
CHALLENGES
Challenges faced in designing this process included:
involving a broad range of perspectives in the conversation (i.e. people across different geographical locations and communities of interest)
effectively conveying technical and complex information to participants
responding to panellist questions and information requests quickly
resourcing and managing a deliberative process – a new engagement approach for Barwon Water
deliberations needed to occur within a limited number of days/hours
KEYS TO SUCCESS
A key objective of the process was gaining informed outputs. This meant panellists had to digest a lot of information, including technical data and reports. This was supported by:
having Barwon Water representatives in the room to observe discussions, clarify and respond to questions and requests,
giving panellists the opportunity to talk to industry experts and Barwon Water specialists,
preparing and communicating complex information in clear and accessible ways,
fast responses to information requests (often on the same day) to ensure panellists had maximum time to digest new information.
Other keys to the project’s success included:
Barwon Water response document: This was provided following day 2 of deliberations in response to the panel’s draft recommendations. It helped the group to clarify intent and understand the impact of their recommendations.
Panel reconvening: The panel met to review community feedback, and refine and modify their recommendations.
Customer check in: Barwon Water re-engaged with the community, publishing proposed prices and services for review before they were finalised.
Barwon Water’s commitment to transparency: This enhanced credibility and accountability throughout the process.
OUTCOMES
Barwon Water’s 2018 Price Submission was presented to the ESC in September 2017. The submission included all recommendations provided by the panel. The ESC has commenced its independent review of all Victorian water corporation’s price submissions. The final decision and price determination is expected to be released in mid-2018.
The positive impacts of this engagement approach went beyond the development of the price submission itself. The process proved transformative for Barwon Water, setting new standards for engagement approaches, creating advocates for the process and proposed prices and inspiring internal conversations. Internal collaboration was key, and the approach taken by the project management team exemplified the importance of inter-department engagement and co-operation.
LEARNINGS:
Key learnings arising from this process included:
Test the organisation’s interpretation of what the panel or jury is saying mid-deliberations - misinterpretations are addressed and the group can clarify the implications of their draft recommendations. They can then refine them accordingly.
Fast turnaround in terms of fact checking and responding to information requests is essential. The faster this is, the more time participants have to digest information.
Honesty is key: Barwon Water transparently outlined why certain recommendations would or would not be feasible.
Reconvening the panel to consider community feedback on and refine their recommendations results in higher quality outputs that have been tested against public opinion.
The videos below feature excerpts of interviews with Tracey Slatter, Managing Director, Barwon Water and Betsy Anderson who was Barwon Water's project manager for this process. Their insights are provided along with interviews with other project managers and decision makers who have led deliberative projects for other organisations.
MORE INFORMATION
For more information on this project visit:
www.barwonwater.vic.gov.au/learning/proposed-prices-2018-2023
ENJOYED THIS POST?
Stay in the know! Get new posts, actionable ideas and fabulous free resources delivered to your inbox - subscribe to our monthly e-newsletter 'the Discussion'.